Uber and Lyft Sexual Assault Lawyer

The Uber MDL expanded to 1,487 active cases by February 2025. Judge Charles R. Breyer has set strict deadlines for selecting bellwether cases, with both parties required to finalize their picks by mid-February. 

The Nevada Supreme Court’s denial of Uber’s proposal to cap attorney fees represents another major victory for victims. 

Legal experts predict that these initial trials, along with the expanding discovery scope, will exert significant pressure on Uber and Lyft to address systemic safety concerns surrounding sexual assault incidents.

The federal MDL against Uber reached 1,459 active sexual assault cases in January 2025, highlighting the company’s mounting legal challenges. Recent filings have raised questions about discovery protocols, as plaintiffs accuse Uber of delaying the production of critical safety data. 

Court rulings have partially favored plaintiffs, requiring Uber to disclose pertinent documents in user-accessible formats. Bellwether trial preparations are well underway, with initial cases scheduled for case-specific discovery ahead of trials in late 2025. 

Meanwhile, Lyft faces its own growing share of lawsuits, further emphasizing the need for systemic safety improvements.

The Uber MDL reached over 1,400 cases by December 2024, marking a steep rise in the litigation’s scope. Discovery disputes dominated recent proceedings, with plaintiffs seeking confidential documents and precedents from unrelated safety claims. 

The court allowed limited document sharing, consistent with its push for data transparency. A November filing further detailed allegations that inadequate background checks and lack of safety measures directly contributed to numerous attacks. 

The first trials in late 2025 are expected to provide significant insights into the accountability of rideshare companies.

A pivotal pretrial ruling in November 2024 allowed vicarious liability claims against Uber and Lyft to move forward. The court focused on the companies’ broader duty of care, particularly the safety assurances made in their marketing and operational structures. 

This ruling directly challenges the defense’s argument that drivers, as independent contractors, fall outside corporate liability. With the total active sexual assault cases approaching 1,500, this legal development could significantly impact Uber and Lyft’s liability exposure. 

Plaintiffs, meanwhile, continue to press for new safety measures to prevent future harm.

To streamline the growing litigation process, the court issued a deposition protocol order in October 2024 for the Uber MDL. 

The new guidelines outline detailed logistical arrangements, including rules for virtual depositions and third-party involvement, such as Lyft’s participation in the Industry Sharing Safety Program (ISSP). 

These measures aim to prevent discovery delays and ensure smooth collaboration moving forward. With over 1,400 cases now consolidated under the MDL, this procedural update marks another critical step in advancing the litigation while protecting survivors’ rights.

Over 946 new sexual assault lawsuits were filed against Uber in August 2024, reflecting an unprecedented surge that brings the total number of cases to nearly 1,300 in the MDL. 

Magistrate Judge Lisa J. Cisneros issued an important discovery order, requiring Uber to provide more transparent data formats and addressing third-party discovery disputes involving Lyft. These cases highlight serious accusations of corporate negligence linked to background checks and safety protocols. 

A discovery status conference is set for the end of September, ensuring continued oversight of the ongoing litigation process.

The Uber multidistrict litigation (MDL No. 3084) saw a critical development in August 2024 as the court ordered Uber to release detailed safety report data. This ruling, prompted by the growing number of sexual assault allegations, underscores the importance of transparency in the litigation process. 

Uber must now provide data from internal systems, such as JIRA and Zendesk, to help plaintiffs demonstrate the company’s awareness of safety risks and alleged negligence. 

With 321 active cases in the MDL and thousands of similar allegations, this information could become crucial evidence as victims seek justice.

The multidistrict litigation (MDL) involving Uber and Lyft, overseen by Judge Charles R. Breyer in the Northern District of California, now includes over 321 cases.

By consolidating these cases into an MDL, the court seeks to streamline pre-trial procedures, ensuring efficiency and consistency across similar ongoing lawsuits.

Two claims of sexual assault by an Uber driver were filed at the beginning and end of May.

The first one was filed by a Boston woman whose case will likely be added to a pending MDL once the case is transferred to federal court.

The second one was filed by a California woman who was sexually assaulted in the backseat of an Uber that was transporting her to a medical appointment.

In May 2024, Uber attempted to argue that its "Terms of Use" should prevent injured rideshare users from consolidating their claims through a Multidistrict Litigation (MDL).

However, the court rejected Uber's assertion, ruling that the company's language barring coordinated legal actions is unenforceable. The court emphasized that enforcing such terms would undermine the benefits of MDLs and hinder effective litigation management.

Furthermore, the court noted that Uber's terms directly contradict the objectives Congress had in mind when establishing MDLs.

This ruling marked a pivotal moment in the ongoing Uber sexual assault MDL. If the court sided with Uber, it would have entirely dismissed the MDL.

On April 10, 2024, Uber Technologies Inc. found itself at the center of a federal lawsuit filed by its shareholders. The litigation accuses the company's leadership of misleading the public and investors regarding the company's safety standards despite being aware of over 9,000 incidents of sexual assaults committed by its drivers.

The lawsuit names the CEO and former CFO as defendants, alleging they profiteered significantly from insider trading and hefty compensation packages while these incidents were allegedly concealed.

43 new cases were added in 2024 alone, escalating the total number of pending lawsuits in this Uber sexual assault multidistrict litigation (MDL) to 230.

A Texas judge has mandated that Uber disclose all documents related to government investigations and that both parties provide detailed fact sheets.

The statute of limitations for filing a lawsuit varies by state. You must act immediately after the incident no matter how long the state provides to file a lawsuit. Contacting law enforcement and a lawyer can help ensure your case is handled promptly and effectively.

Even if you do not have physical injuries, you may still be entitled to compensation for the emotional distress and trauma caused by the assault. Our attorneys will work with you to understand the full impact of the assault on your life and seek appropriate damages.

Yes, you may still be able to file a lawsuit in your home state, even if the assault occurred in another state. Our attorneys have experience handling cross-jurisdictional cases and can assist you in seeking justice no matter where the assault occurred.

Consult an experienced rideshare sexual assault lawyer before accepting any settlement offers. These companies often try to offer low settlements to avoid negative publicity, and our attorneys can help you negotiate for a fair amount that fully compensates you for your damages.